Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian LeBlanc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Julian LeBlanc

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Julian LeBlanc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actor, not properly referenced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, actors do not get an automatic notability freebie just because acting roles have been had -- the notability test requires some quantifiable evidence of the significance of their acting roles, such as notable acting awards and/or substantive coverage about them and their performances to establish passage of WP:GNG. But this ascribes the subject solely with supporting or bit parts rather than major starring roles, cites absolutely no evidence of notability-building coverage, and has already had to have some "up and coming star" advertorialism stripped from it. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any proper referencing. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2008-08 ✗ A1

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.